ReviewActa gastroenterologica Latinoamericana
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist and Gastrointestinal Adverse Effects: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Acta gastroenterologica Latinoamericana. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) has transformed the management of type 2 diabetes and obesity, with expanding indications now spanning cardiovascular, renal, and hepatic disease. As exposure broadens across increasingly diverse populations, gastrointestinal adverse events (GIAEs) have emerged as the dominant tolerability limitation and a leading drug-related reason for discontinuation of treatment. This review synthesizes the mechanisms, clinical spectrum, and management of GLP-1 RA-associated GIAEs. These effects arise from a dual peripheral-central mechanism: peripheral receptor activation slows gastric motility, whereas activation in the area postrema and nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS) drives nausea and emesis. This dual mechanism explains why symptom severity may correlate poorly with the measured degree of gastric-emptying delay and why centrally acting antiemetics are most widely used to relieve nausea and emesis. Across clinical trials, nausea, emesis, diarrhea, constipation, and abdominal pain follow a consistent dose- and indication-dependent gradient, with the highest incidence observed with higher-dose obesity and MASH regimens and multi-agonist molecules. Most symptoms are mild, emerge during dose escalation, and attenuate over time, though a clinically important minority of patients experience persistent symptoms, and a subset develops gastroparesis. Management should rest on anticipation and screening of gastrointestinal symptoms at baseline, pretreatment counseling, gradual up-titration, and dietary measures before pharmacotherapy. Future priorities include standardized motility measurements and endpoints, predictive biomarkers, and evidence-based management algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.