ReviewBreathe (Sheffield, England)2026
Mechanical ventilation in acute brain injury.
Review in Breathe (Sheffield, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute brain injury (ABI) includes traumatic brain injury, subarachnoid and intracerebral haemorrhage, ischaemic stroke and global hypoxic-ischaemic injury, and patients often require admission to intensive care. Although pathologically heterogeneous, they share common mechanisms of primary injury followed by secondary brain injury. Systemic derangements such as hypoxaemia, dysregulated carbon dioxide tension and elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) may exacerbate secondary injury and should be avoided. Patients with ABI often require invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), and of these up to 19-22% may develop acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lung-protective ventilation (LPV) strategies using low tidal volumes and moderate positive end-expiratory pressure to minimise ventilator-induced lung injury are established practices in patients requiring IMV. However, strict application of LPV principles may conflict with neuro-protective goals, particularly carbon dioxide control to optimise cerebral blood flow and avoid rises in ICP. This review examines the physiological tension between lung and brain protection, focusing on neuro-respiratory interactions and brain-lung crosstalk. We synthesise the evidence on ventilatory strategies in the context of patients with ABI, discuss the implications for neurological and pulmonary outcomes, and highlight the need for an integrated, individualised approach to ventilation in these patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.