ReviewMedComm2026
Advanced Glycation End Products: From Pathogenesis to Treatment.
Review in MedComm, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) are chemically heterogeneous modifications generated through nonenzymatic glycation, glycoxidation, and carbonyl stress. Their accumulation increases during aging and is accelerated by hyperglycemia, oxidative stress, inflammation, exogenous exposure, and impaired renal clearance. Although AGE biology has often been framed around the AGE-RAGE-oxidative stress axis, current evidence supports a broader systems-level model in which AGE burden reflects the balance among formation, detoxification, tissue retention, and clearance. This review summarizes AGE chemistry, endogenous and exogenous sources, detoxification pathways, receptor systems, and mechanisms of AGE-mediated tissue injury. We distinguish two complementary pathogenic routes: receptor-independent structural damage, including protein dysfunction, proteostatic stress, extracellular matrix crosslinking, and altered tissue mechanics; and receptor-dependent signaling, mainly through RAGE-mediated redox-inflammatory amplification. We then examine the clinical relevance of AGEs in diabetes, cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, neurovascular and retinal dysfunction, fibrosis, and aging-related tissue decline. Particular attention is given to compartment-specific biomarker interpretation, because circulating free adducts, protein-bound AGEs, tissue autofluorescence, dietary AGE estimates, and dicarbonyl stress markers are not interchangeable. Finally, we evaluate therapeutic strategies and propose a framework that matches each intervention to the relevant mechanism and can be tested clinically. In doing so, the review clarifies major conceptual and methodological uncertainties in AGE research and provides a foundation for more rigorous biomarker interpretation, study design, and clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.