Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42871833›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of general medicine2026

Recent Advances in the Diagnosis and Management of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Narrative Review.

Qian Wang, Yue Liu, Linlin Sun

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of general medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qian WangDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Lequn Branch, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, People's Republic of China.
Yue LiuDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Lequn Branch, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, People's Republic of China.
Linlin SunDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Lequn Branch, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0001-4932-7456

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is one of the most common metabolic disorders of pregnancy and is associated with adverse short- and long-term health outcomes in both mothers and offspring. Its increasing global prevalence and substantial heterogeneity in pathogenesis and clinical presentation underscore the limitations of conventional glucose-centered approaches to risk assessment and management. Although the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) remains the established diagnostic standard, its relatively late diagnostic window and limited ability to predict disease development have stimulated interest in novel strategies for early risk stratification and individualized care. Importantly, emerging approaches are not yet sufficiently validated to replace the OGTT in routine clinical practice. This narrative review summarizes recent advances in GDM diagnosis and management, focusing on emerging biomarkers, multi-omics technologies, artificial intelligence (AI), and precision medicine. We examine the potential roles of inflammatory biomarkers, adipokines, metabolomic signatures, gut microbiota, and genomic and transcriptomic profiles in the early prediction of GDM, as well as AI-based models integrating multidimensional clinical and molecular data. Advances in precision nutrition, continuous glucose monitoring, pharmacological optimization, digital health technologies, and microbiota-targeted interventions are also discussed. Particular attention is given to the distinction between clinically established strategies, promising approaches supported by emerging evidence, and exploratory technologies that remain investigational. Despite substantial progress, important challenges remain, including heterogeneity in diagnostic criteria, limited reproducibility and clinical translation of multi-omics findings, insufficient external validation of AI models, and barriers to the implementation of individualized management. Key evidence gaps include the need for prospective and external validation, cost-effectiveness assessments, regulatory evaluation, and real-world implementation studies. Precision medicine in GDM should therefore be viewed as an evolving framework that integrates molecular, metabolic, clinical, and environmental information to improve risk stratification and guide individualized management rather than as a replacement for established diagnostic standards. Future GDM care is likely to move toward integrated precision medicine models combining multi-omics profiling, AI-assisted decision support, continuous metabolic monitoring, and personalized interventions, with the ultimate goal of improving maternal and offspring health across the life course.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebiomarkerscontinuous glucose monitoringgestational diabetes mellitusgut microbiotamulti-omicsprecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID42871833
PMCPMC13660840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.