ReviewPrzeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review2026
Modern methods of treating vaginal dryness and atrophy.
Review in Przeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vaginal dryness is a prevalent and multifactorial condition affecting women across all age groups. Although most common in peri- and postmenopausal populations, it is also observed in younger women due to hormonal imbalances, endocrine disorders (e.g., polycystic ovary syndrome, type 2 diabetes), autoimmune diseases, infections, pharmacotherapy (e.g. selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, hormonal contraceptives, oncological treatments), and lifestyle factors such as smoking. To review the etiopathogenesis of vaginal dryness and assess current treatment modalities offered by aesthetic and cosmetic gynaecology. A comprehensive analysis of current literature was performed to identify key pathophysiological factors, including oestrogen deficiency, mucosal inflammation, epithelial thinning, and dysbiosis. The clinical efficacy and indications for various treatment modalities were critically assessed. Energy-based treatments (e.g., laser therapy, radiofrequency, high-intensity focused ultrasound, nanoultrasound) have shown promising outcomes in restoring tissue hydration and elasticity, especially in postmenopausal and oncology patients. Injectable therapies - such as hyaluronic acid, platelet-rich plasma, and tropocollagen - support local tissue repair and mucosal regeneration. Hormone replacement therapy remains the standard of care in oestrogen-deficient patients, whereas non-hormonal agents, including topical moisturisers, offer symptom relief in individuals with contraindications to hormonal interventions. Vaginal dryness requires an individualised treatment approach based on the underlying aetiology, hormonal status, and patient-specific factors. Combined or sequential therapies may yield superior outcomes in terms of symptom management and overall patient satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.