ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2026
Unsupervised machine learning identifies two distinct posterior tibial slope clusters largely independent of Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee in osteoarthritic knees.
Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Coronal-plane classifications such as the Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification support individualized total knee arthroplasty (TKA) planning but do not account for sagittal-plane morphology, particularly the posterior tibial slope (PTS). This study aimed to determine whether unsupervised machine learning (k-means clustering) could identify naturally occurring PTS phenotypes in osteoarthritic knees and to evaluate their association with CPAK classification and joint line obliquity (JLO). Methods: This retrospective radiographic cohort study included 3337 osteoarthritic knees from 1746 patients. PTS was measured on lateral knee radiographs in all 3337 knees, using the posterior tibial cortex and the medial tibial plateau as reference lines. Full-length standing radiographs were available for 464 knees; in these knees, the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and the lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) were measured to calculate the arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA) and JLO, and each knee was classified according to CPAK. K-means clustering was used to identify PTS subgroups without predefined thresholds, and cluster validity was assessed using the elbow method and silhouette analysis. Associations between PTS clusters, CPAK phenotypes and radiographic parameters were analysed using the Results: The median PTS was 5.6° (interquartile range 3.4°-7.7°). K-means clustering identified two PTS clusters: a shallow-slope cluster centred at 3.56°, comprising 55.91% of the knees and a steep-slope cluster centred at 8.52°, comprising 44.09%. No individual CPAK phenotype was significantly overrepresented within either cluster. When phenotypes were grouped according to joint line orientation, however, apex-distal phenotypes (I-III) were more frequently assigned to the steep-slope cluster, whereas apex-neutral phenotypes (IV-VI) were more frequently assigned to the shallow-slope cluster. JLO was significantly higher in the shallow-slope cluster and PTS showed a modest inverse correlation with JLO. Conclusions: Unsupervised k-means clustering identified two distinct sagittal PTS phenotypes in osteoarthritic knees. PTS varied largely independently of the individual CPAK phenotypes, although an association with JLO was observed. Sagittal morphology may therefore provide complementary information beyond coronal alignment classifications for the individualized planning of knee surgery. Level of Evidence: Level IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.