Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42871748›Full record

ArticleJCPP advances2026

Paranoia and social anxiety: Structural and temporal relationships across adolescence.

Jessica L Kingston, Björn Schlier, Richard P Bentall, Christopher D J Taylor, Eleanor Leigh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCPP advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jessica L KingstonDepartment of Psychology Royal Holloway University of London Egham UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1142-8083
Björn SchlierUniversity of Wuppertal Wuppertal Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9533-1819
Richard P BentallSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Science University of Sheffield Sheffield UK.
Christopher D J TaylorSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Science University of Sheffield Sheffield UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1989-883X
Eleanor LeighDepartment of Experimental Psychology University of Oxford Oxford UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2756-3770

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Social anxiety (SA) and paranoia (PA) are commonly experienced during adolescence, but the nature of their co-development is largely unknown. Greater clarity could significantly advance our understanding of both conditions, and of their progression into serious mental illness. Methods: Utilising the Neuroscience in Psychiatry Network 2k cohort data, an accelerated cohort design study in 14-22 year olds, pre-registered hypotheses examined: (1) via measurement models, whether SA and PA were statistically distinguishable; (2) whether SA at a given time-point was significantly associated with subsequent PA at the next time point; and (3) common co-developmental trajectories through adolescence (e.g., low in both; high SA, low PA, etc.). Results: (1) Measurement models indicated that two and three factor models, with SA and PA as related but separate constructs, best fit the data across all age groups, (2) in cross-lagged panel analysis, SA was a more significant predictor of subsequent (approximately 1 year later) PA than vice versa; (3) Six common patterns in how SA and PA developed together over time (i.e., co-developmental trajectories) were detected, whereby low levels of each were most common, followed by clusters with elevated SA but not PA, followed by mid and descending SA and mid PA, or elevated levels on each. Conclusion: SA and PA are commonly comorbid in adolescence. More evidence was obtained for the

Indexed as

accelerated cohort designadolescencelongitudinalparanoiasocial anxiety

Identifiers

PMID42871748
PMCPMC13658955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.