ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2026
Image-based analysis of lymphoma cell heterogeneity: Comparative study of CRYO and FFPE techniques.
Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lymphomas comprise a diverse group of heterogeneous cell malignancies, primarily diagnosed through morphological and histochemical analysis of tissue biopsy specimens. Accurate automated nuclear segmentation is essential for quantitative histopathological analysis and downstream computational pathology applications, particularly in morphological heterogeneous lymphoma tissues. In the current study, we used deep learning-based approaches, namely a pre-trained StarDist model, a custom-trained StarDist model, and DeepLabV3, for automated nuclear segmentation of heterogeneous lymphoma cells in histological sections and achieved high accuracy of nuclear segmentation. DeepLabV3 achieved the highest pixel-level segmentation accuracy when trained on large annotated datasets, whereas StarDist demonstrated greater data efficiency under limited training conditions. We next compared the accuracy of nuclear segmentation between conventional formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens and recently proposed glyoxal-based processing of rapidly frozen samples (CRYO). Overall, segmentation performance on CRYO specimens was comparable to that on FFPE specimens, although the magnitude and direction of differences varied by models. Custom-trained StarDist achieved a modestly higher Dice coefficient on CRYO specimens, whereas DeepLabV3 showed only a small, non-significant difference, and the pre-trained StarDist model showed no significant difference between tissue preparations. DeepLabV3 provided superior pixel-level segmentation accuracy, whereas StarDist demonstrated more accurate boundary localization, instance-level segmentation, and greater robustness to reduced training data. We conclude that both StarDist and DeepLabV3 can provide high-precision nuclear segmentation across FFPE and CRYO lymphoma specimens, supporting the applicability of CRYO processing for computational pathology workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.