Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42871720›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroanatomy2026

Cajal the artist. The origins of a passion.

Jairo A Rozo, Leonardo Palacios-Sánchez, Andrés M Pérez-Acosta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroanatomy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jairo A RozoIván Pavlov Laboratory, Fundación Universitaria Los Libertadores, Bogotá, Colombia.
Leonardo Palacios-SánchezNeuroscience Research Group, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia.
Andrés M Pérez-AcostaNeuroscience Research Group, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Santiago Ramón y Cajal is widely recognized as the father of modern neuroscience. However, his life has many extraordinary facets, and he is even considered a polymath. Among his many activities, his artistic endeavors stand out, and this article focuses on exploring the origins of Cajal's passion for the arts. The Aragonese scholar cultivated drawing, painting, literature, chess, and, notably, photography with equal intensity and passion. This article shows Cajal's artistic dimension, exploring the origins and evolution of his passion for drawing, painting, and photography. We demonstrate that his profound visual capacity and the technical skill developed through his art were not unrelated to his scientific work. On the contrary, they became the fundamental support for his ability to innovate and document the delicate structures of the nervous system through beautiful drawings and photographs that allowed him to show humanity the "butterflies of the soul," the name he gave to the elegant cells he saw in nervous tissue. His inclination for drawing was evident from childhood, and despite serious conflicts with his father, who desperately wanted him to become a doctor, he managed to take painting courses and perfect his technique. His work as a painter, writer, and photographer is presented, leaving the door open for future explorations into the life of a great man who continues to amaze almost a century after his passing.

Indexed as

drawingliteratureneurosciencephotographySantiago Ramón y Cajal (1852–1934)

Identifiers

PMID42871720
PMCPMC13659217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.