ArticleData in brief2026
Dataset of anonymized clinical events and notes from obstetric electronic health records for NLP.
Article in Data in brief, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interoperability remains a global challenge in healthcare systems. Addressing the need for standardized health data to ensure compatibility would enable large-scale clinical data analysis and systematic studies across heterogeneous databases, generating statistical information to support the analysis of health conditions. Healthcare data documented in Spanish face a critical limitation: the limited availability of standardized, representative, and publicly accessible real-world clinical datasets to support the development and evaluation of data-driven approaches, including Natural Language Processing (NLP) applications for treatment support, diagnosis, patient monitoring, and observational research. Analyses conducted on proprietary hospital data models are often subject to population-specific biases. Moreover, artificial intelligence applications, such as NLP using large language models (LLMs), face significant constraints due to heterogeneous clinical workflows and non-standardized storage schemas. Adherence to standardized data models, supported by syntactic and semantic standardization processes, facilitates multicenter and large-scale observational research. In this work, we present a Spanish-language dataset comprising 23,879 electronic health records (EHRs), each corresponding to a unique patient treated in a gynecology and obstetrics setting at the Clínica Universitaria Bolivariana, a national reference institution in Colombia. The dataset was standardized according to the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) Common Data Model (version 5.4). It includes both structured and unstructured patient data from deliveries attended between 2015 and 2017. The dataset contains >3.7 million anonymized clinical notes in Spanish natural language, preserving confidentiality and privacy. It integrates 89,893 clinical events from which 200,070 observations related to diagnoses and procedures are derived, together with associated clinical documentation. Standardization under the OMOP framework enables harmonization with additional data sources to address research questions and to generate clinical evidence for large-scale observational studies. This dataset supports reuse in research focused on the development, training, and evaluation of tools-particularly in clinical NLP in Spanish-as well as comparative studies between structured data and free-text clinical documentation in large-scale healthcare settings, thereby contributing evidence grounded in real-world medical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.