ArticleMedical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran2026
External Validation of the Trauma Early Mortality Prediction Tool (TEMPT) in an Iranian Trauma Population.
Article in Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Trauma remains the leading cause of mortality in the first four decades of life globally. Despite advances in trauma care, accurate early mortality prediction remains challenging. The Trauma Early Mortality Prediction Tool (TEMPT) was developed as a simplified scoring system, but its validity in diverse populations requires evaluation. Methods: This cross-sectional study analyzed trauma patients admitted to Sina Hospital between 2019 and 2021. TEMPT variables, including age, systolic blood pressure, International Normalized Ratio (INR), Partial Thromboplastin Time (PTT), base excess, temperature, and traumatic brain injury (TBI) presence, were collected retrospectively. Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and Injury Severity Score (ISS) were also assessed. Logistic regression and ROC curve analysis compared TEMPT's predictive performance. Of 1,052 eligible patients, 809 (77%) were excluded due to incomplete data, potentially introducing selection bias. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Results: Of 1,052 eligible patients, complete data were available for 243 patients. The cohort was predominantly male (82.7%), with a mean age of 41.9±18.4 years. Overall mortality was 11.1%. Among TEMPT variables, only age (OR: 1.053, 95% CI: 1.02-1.08, Conclusion: TEMPT demonstrated limited external validity in this Iranian trauma population. Traditional scoring systems (GCS and ISS) outperformed TEMPT in mortality prediction. Population-specific validation and potential recalibration of scoring thresholds are essential before implementing TEMPT in diverse healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.