ReviewACS pharmacology & translational science2026
Engineering Oxidative Stress for Precision Therapy: Reactive Oxygen Species-Responsive Hydrogel-Nanocarrier Systems as Translational Redox Drug-Delivery Platforms.
Review in ACS pharmacology & translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are regulated chemical signals that become pathological when production exceeds antioxidant buffering. This duality creates a translational drug-delivery opportunity: therapeutic systems can be engineered to remain stable under basal redox conditions while activating in oxidatively stressed tissues. This Review critically evaluates ROS-responsive hydrogel-nanocarrier systems as multiscale platforms for localized redox therapy. The discussion is organized around quantitative and clinically relevant design logic rather than broad cataloging. We first define hydrogels, nanocarriers, redox therapy, and hybrid hydrogel-nanocarrier systems for pharmacology, drug-delivery, and materials-science readers. We then compare physiological and pathological ROS ranges, common ROS measurement methods, and the in vitro conditions typically used to test hydrogel responsiveness. Responsive chemistries, including thioketals, aryl boronates, thioethers, disulfides, selenium/tellurium motifs, catechol/polydopamine systems, and nanozyme components, are connected to material outcomes such as degradation, swelling, self-healing, cargo release, catalytic ROS conversion, and tissue adhesion. Primary literature examples are used to link polymer composition, nanocarrier type, payload, route of administration, ROS assay, and therapeutic end point across chronic wounds, infection, cancer, myocardial injury, neural injury, and osteoarthritis. The Review concludes with translational considerations for manufacturability, sterilization, storage stability, biosafety, regulatory classification, and clinically realistic validation. Overall, progress in ROS-responsive therapeutics will depend on matching disease-specific redox biology with chemically validated, quantitatively benchmarked, and pharmacologically meaningful material design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.