Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42871686›Full record

ArticleAME case reports2026

Isolated splenic metastases from colorectal carcinoma and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor: a report of two rare cases.

Evan Cho, Amber Lee Chang, Ching-Kuo Chang

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in AME case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Evan ChoCalifornia Northstate University, College of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7865-7411
Amber Lee ChangUniversity of South Florida, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9149-2329
Ching-Kuo ChangKaiser-Permanente, Oakland, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8578-9183

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Splenic metastases usually historically signal pre-terminal malignancy, arising amid widespread tumor dissemination and most often discovered at autopsy. Isolated splenic metastases without disseminated disease are exceedingly rare, with only a limited number of cases reported in the literature. Recognizing these presentations is important as isolated splenic involvement may be amenable to definitive management in contrast to the poor prognosis associated with splenic spread. Case Description: In this report, we present two patients with isolated splenic metastases. The first is an 83-year-old patient with splenic metastasis secondary to colorectal cancer. The second is a 29-year-old patient with splenic metastasis secondary to a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET), which, to our knowledge, may represent a novel incidence. Neither patient had evidence of disseminated disease at presentation. In this case report, we review the clinical presentation, diagnostic workup, and management of both cases, each of which demonstrate a favorable short-term outcome. Conclusions: These cases taken together show that isolated splenic disease, when identified in the absence of widespread metastasis, can be operatively and chemically managed with favorable short-term results. The PNET patient in particular broadens the recognized spectrum of primary tumor locations that can metastasize to the spleen in isolation. Further reports and longer follow-ups, however, are needed to identify the optimal management and longer-term prognoses.

Indexed as

case reportcolorectal carcinomapancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET)Splenic metastases

Identifiers

PMID42871686
PMCPMC13659175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.