ArticleTranslational pediatrics2026
Neonatal apnea research: a bibliometric analysis of trends, clusters, and paradigm shifts.
Article in Translational pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The clinical paradigm for neonatal apnea has shifted profoundly, from managing acute cardiorespiratory events to preventing adverse long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes. This evolution has generated a vast and complex body of research, yet a systematic map of its historical trajectory, intellectual structure, and emerging frontiers is currently lacking. This study provides the first comprehensive bibliometric analysis of the global research landscape of neonatal apnea. Methods: Publications from the Web of Science Core Collection up to December 31, 2025 were retrieved, with 2,517 articles included for analysis. Co-authorship, citation, and keyword co-occurrence analyses were performed using VOSviewer and Bibliometrix to identify influential contributors, foundational research, and thematic evolution. Results: Research output showed sustained exponential growth (R Conclusions: This study charts the 46-year evolution of neonatal apnea research, quantitatively mapping its paradigm shift from a focus on acute respiratory control to a deep interrogation of its long-term neurodevelopmental consequences. Our findings provide a data-driven framework that identifies foundational pillars, core research areas, and critical emerging frontiers, offering a valuable compass for future investigation in this vital field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.