ArticleThe journal of climate change and health
Planetary health at a decade: from Bellagio to practice.
Article in The journal of climate change and health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In its first formally defined decade, the "planetary health" framing has had demonstrable impact but barriers to more radical action remain. Objectives: We reflect on progress during planetary health's first decade, identify barriers limiting its wider uptake and application, and propose pragmatic communication approaches for engaging health practitioners, policymakers and the public. Methods: We have drawn on our experience as two practitioners working at the nexus of climate and health, merging our perspective with a targeted literature search. Results: In its first ten years, the field of planetary health has shaped systems thinking and shown significant impact on curricula, research, funding and publications. Possible obstacles for achieving greater transformational change include abstraction, resource intensity of transdisciplinary research, inadequate integration of Indigenous and local knowledge, politics, and academic siloes. Safeguarding of human health requires a shift to integrated, systemic thinking that resonates beyond academia, and reframing of core messages to tailor to specific health practitioner, policymaker and public audiences. Conclusions: Planetary health is a valuable integrative paradigm, but actionable cross-sectoral translation of its conceptual ambition requires pragmatic operational guidance, flexible framing, and avoidance of over-complication and political obstruction. This next decade must prioritize translation and urgent, applied policy and practice action.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.