Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42871633›Full record

ArticleThe journal of climate change and health

Planetary health at a decade: from Bellagio to practice.

Ann Kurth, Karin Leder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of climate change and health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ann KurthNew York Academy of Medicine, USA.
Karin LederCo-lead Planetary Health Division and Head of Infectious Diseases Epidemiology Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In its first formally defined decade, the "planetary health" framing has had demonstrable impact but barriers to more radical action remain. Objectives: We reflect on progress during planetary health's first decade, identify barriers limiting its wider uptake and application, and propose pragmatic communication approaches for engaging health practitioners, policymakers and the public. Methods: We have drawn on our experience as two practitioners working at the nexus of climate and health, merging our perspective with a targeted literature search. Results: In its first ten years, the field of planetary health has shaped systems thinking and shown significant impact on curricula, research, funding and publications. Possible obstacles for achieving greater transformational change include abstraction, resource intensity of transdisciplinary research, inadequate integration of Indigenous and local knowledge, politics, and academic siloes. Safeguarding of human health requires a shift to integrated, systemic thinking that resonates beyond academia, and reframing of core messages to tailor to specific health practitioner, policymaker and public audiences. Conclusions: Planetary health is a valuable integrative paradigm, but actionable cross-sectoral translation of its conceptual ambition requires pragmatic operational guidance, flexible framing, and avoidance of over-complication and political obstruction. This next decade must prioritize translation and urgent, applied policy and practice action.

Indexed as

Climate change and healthEnvironmental healthGlobal healthHealth communicationHealth equityHealth policyHealth systemsPlanetary healthPublic health

Identifiers

PMID42871633
PMCPMC13658867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.