ArticleResuscitation plus2026
Intra-arrest strategies to treat cardiac arrest due to a non-opioid toxicological causes in adults and children: a systematic review.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To summarise evidence on the effectiveness of specific alterations to standard advanced life support during ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults and children with cardiac arrest due to a presumed toxicological cause. Methods: We searched MEDLINE (OVID platform), Embase (OVID platform), and Cochrane CENTRAL from inception to 22nd July 2026 for relevant observational and interventional studies with a control group. We excluded studies focussed specifically on opioid toxicity. Two authors independently screened studies for inclusion. Our primary outcome was 30-day survival. We assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane recommended tools and certainty of evidence using the GRADE system. Results: We identified four observational studies, of which none specifically focused on children and three included fewer than 100 patients. Studies examined general toxicological causes ( Conclusion: Current evidence does not support the modification of standard advanced life support during cardiac arrest due to a presumed toxicological cause in adults or children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.