ArticleFrontiers in neurology2026
Dual-informant clinical outcome assessment in the inclusive orchestra: measurement architecture for neurodevelopmental disorders prior to empirical evaluation.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Systematic behavioral observation in a group requires the rater to know when a target behavior could have occurred. In an inclusive orchestra the notated part and the conductor's cues generate that occasion outside the participant, before the session. This pre-implementation study builds a dual-informant clinical outcome assessment architecture on that property, for adolescents and adults with neurodevelopmental disorders. Methods: The architecture comprises two context-specific candidate instruments, each of five seven-item domains. Working independently, two psychologists will score the same replayable 20-min orchestral segment within 24 h using the clinician-reported instrument (ClinRO-T), while a nominated caregiver completes the observer-reported instrument (ObsRO-P) for daily-life behavior directly observed during the subsequent 48 h. Paired items share an observable referent, and their correspondence is functional. An item-level grid predefines each behavioral referent, the event or window that creates a scoring opportunity, and the codes for structural inapplicability, unobservability and technical failure. A focal-participant rotation will yield 100 participant-session observations from 20 participants over 20 weeks, each independently double-coded in the clinician channel. A modified Delphi process and cognitive interviewing will precede form freeze. The first observational phase will report window adherence, coding burden, code distribution, inter-rater agreement at count, band and domain level, and the suitability of the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales as an external interpretive reference. Conclusion: The design preserves separate orchestral-session and daily-life assessment channels. Both instruments remain candidate clinical outcome assessments. No participants have been enrolled, no psychometric data are reported, and no measurement property is claimed as established.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.