ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2026
Biosimilar uptake policies in Europe: a cross-country mixed-methods policy analysis.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: European countries implemented a range of policies to enhance uptake of biosimilar medicines, which are interchangeable with the originator but usually offer biological therapies at lower cost. However, challenges to biosimilar uptake persist. The study analysed the effectiveness of policies to improve biosimilar uptake. Methods: Based on 2024 IQVIA MIDAS® data, biosimilar market shares were determined for 27 European countries. Data on supply-side policies (i.e., targeting price and funding) and demand-side policies (i.e., addressing stakeholders) implemented across the countries was obtained from information generated by the Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement Information (PPRI) network and validated by country experts. Biosimilar market shares were analysed in relation to the policies implemented in each country. Selected case studies illustrated how biosimilar uptake developed before and after the introduction of a policy. A literature review identified evaluations of biosimilar policies implemented individually or as a package. Findings: Biosimilar market shares varied substantially across Europe, ranging from above 50% (e.g., Norway, Italy) to below 10% (Greece, Luxembourg). All countries studied had biosimilar policies in place, but their design varied. Frequent policies were tendering, encouraging prescribers to switch medication from the originator to the biosimilar, and price setting based on the originator's price (biosimilar price link). Gain-sharing models, switching, the biosimilar price link and prescribing quotas were associated with higher biosimilar market shares. Interpretation: The study confirmed the importance of implementing policies and suggested that demand-side measures are particularly effective in increasing biosimilar uptake. Funding: European Commission under the EU4Health Programme.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.