ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Frontal-striatal-thalamic circuit dysfunction and inferential processing between internal representations and external events across the psychosis spectrum.
Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In psychopathology, schizophrenia has been understood as a disorder characterized by disturbances in subjective consciousness. Subjective consciousness and its relationship to interactions between internal representations and external events have been discussed in phenomenology. Recent computational neuroscience conceptualizes the brain as an inferential system that minimizes discrepancies between internal models and latent states inferred from environmental information. From a neurobiological perspective, the frontal-striatal-thalamic circuit may underlie the inferential processing involved in updating internal models based on sensory information derived from the environment. Aim: In this review, we aimed to examine the theoretical point of contact between phenomenology and computational neuroscience from the perspective of inferential processing within the frontal-striatal-thalamic circuit. An imbalance within this circuit may disrupt inferential processes that minimize discrepancies between internal models and latent states. Such maladaptive inferential processes may distort subjective experiences, potentially contributing to the symptoms observed in At-Risk Mental States (ARMS) and Attenuated Psychosis Syndrome (APS), which are considered clinically high-risk states for psychosis. Based on these considerations, we propose a model linking psychopathological phenomena and neurobiological alterations through the dysfunction of the frontal-striatal-thalamic circuit and associated disturbances in inferential processing. We assessed whether this model was theoretically consistent with previous findings and our own longitudinal studies on ARMS/APS. Conclusions: This conceptual model may provide a novel perspective on the information-processing mechanisms, particularly inferential processing, and their alterations across high-risk clinical states for psychosis, including ARMS/APS and broader Clinical High At Risk Mental States (CHARMS) concept.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.