Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42871445›Full record

Trial reportFrontiers in public health2026

Controlled deep breathing technique intervention effects on resting EEG, subjective psychological distress, and executive function performance in young adults.

Ohav Ivgi, Oded Meiron

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ohav IvgiBrain and Memory Laboratory, Faculty of Education, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Oded MeironBrain and Memory Laboratory, Faculty of Education, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Controlled breathing techniques have been widely investigated for their role in emotional regulation; however, their effects on resting-state neural oscillatory activity and psychological distress remain insufficiently characterized. The present study examined whether a Controlled Deep Breathing Technique (CDBT) intervention modulates resting-state electroencephalographic (EEG) activity and subjective psychological distress in healthy adults. Forty healthy adults (ages 18 to 40 years) were randomly assigned to an experimental (CDBT) or control (natural breathing) intervention group for 20 min. Resting-state quantitative EEG (qEEG) was recorded before and after the intervention under eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions. Behavioral measures included assessments of subjective psychological distress and executive functioning. qEEG analyses during resting-state focused on alpha/beta power ratios at frontal and parietal electrodes. Results showed a significant increase in alpha/beta ratios in the experimental group compared with the control group, particularly during the eyes-closed condition and at parietal electrodes. The experimental group also showed significant reductions in psychological distress scores and improvements in executive functioning measures, whereas no significant changes were observed in the control group. These findings suggest that CDBT may modulate frontoparietal oscillatory dynamics associated with relaxed mental states and improved executive functioning, providing preliminary evidence that CDBT may influence emotional regulation and cognitive control in healthy adults.

Indexed as

Breathing ExercisesElectroencephalographyExecutive FunctionStress, PsychologicalAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adultalpha oscillationscognitive controlcontrolled breathingemotion regulationqEEG

Identifiers

PMID42871445
PMCPMC13658526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.