Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42871444›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

The Use of Situational Judgement Tests for Paramedic Selection in Canada: A National Cross-Sectional Survey.

Ryan G Tingley, Jan L Jensen, Judah Goldstein, Aaron Sibley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ryan G TingleyParamedicine, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, CAN.
Jan L JensenEmergency Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, CAN.
Judah GoldsteinEmergency Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, CAN.
Aaron SibleyEmergency Medicine, Dalhousie University, Charlottetown, CAN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background It is important for paramedics to have strong interpersonal and cognitive skills. Despite the importance of such skills, the paramedic field has incorporated few tools to evaluate these attributes. Situational Judgment Tests (SJTs) are psychometric tools that use scenario-based questions to quantify personal and cognitive attributes. Though extensive literature exists on the use of SJTs, few studies explore the current state of SJT use in the paramedic field. Methods In this national survey study, we aimed to understand the current use of SJTs and other tools in the hiring of frontline paramedics by Canadian paramedic services. The survey also included questions about the use of Multiple Mini Interview (MMI), which are station-based interviews that have been found to validly evaluate the interpersonal and cognitive skills of paramedics for the purpose of hiring decisions. Results A total of 21 services left unique, complete responses. Neither SJTs nor MMIs are widely used in Canada. Only smaller paramedic services reported that they were using SJTs and MMIs, despite these tools being designed for mass testing. Conclusions Though a role has been identified for SJTs in paramedic selection and education, paramedic services in Canada do not appear to widely use SJTs to inform their hiring processes.

Indexed as

continuing educationmultiple mini-interviewsnon-technical skillsparamedicselectionsituational judgment testssurvey

Identifiers

PMID42871444
PMCPMC13659165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.