Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42871440›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2026

Derivation of a blood count-based machine learning model to prioritise sequencing for high-risk clonal haematopoiesis: a retrospective cohort study.

Riya Nandi, Kun Zhao, Yash Pershad, Nabi Nazmoon Khondoker, Caitlyn Vlasschaert, Md Mesbah Uddin, Pradeep Natarajan, Daniel J DeAngelo, Marlise R Luskin, R Coleman Lindsley and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Riya NandiDivision of Population Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Kun ZhaoDivision of Genetic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Yash PershadDivision of Genetic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Nabi Nazmoon KhondokerHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Caitlyn VlasschaertQueens University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Md Mesbah UddinHeart and Vascular Institute, Massachusetts General Brigham, Boston, MA, USA.
Pradeep NatarajanHeart and Vascular Institute, Massachusetts General Brigham, Boston, MA, USA.
Daniel J DeAngeloDivision of Hematologic Malignancies, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Marlise R LuskinDivision of Hematologic Malignancies, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
R Coleman LindsleyDivision of Hematologic Malignancies, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Hajime UnoDivision of Population Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Shai ShimonyDivision of Hematologic Malignancies, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Alexander G BickDivision of Genetic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Lachelle D WeeksDivision of Population Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Clonal Hematopoiesis Aging Resiliency MechanismsR01AG088657 · NIA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Alexander Bick, Siddhartha Jaiswal · 2024 to 2026
$6.6M
Establishing the dynamics of lymphoid clonal hematopoiesis and its aging-related disease consequencesR01AG083736 · NIA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Paul L. Auer, Alexander Bick · 2023 to 2026
$2.8M
Inflammatory Disease Associations in Clonal HematopoiesisK08HL171883 · NHLBI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI Lachelle Dawn Weeks · 2024 to 2026
$495k
NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL171883NIA NIH HHS R01 AG083736NIA NIH HHS R01 AG088657
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Clonal haematopoiesis is a precursor of myeloid neoplasia and common in older adults, Precursor risk stratification is critical to early cancer detection, guiding surveillance and prevention efforts to high-risk populations. Existing clonal haematopoiesis risk scores use molecular features to estimate risk of myeloid neoplasia, but only around 1% of adults with detectable clonal haematopoiesis are at high risk of myeloid neoplasia transformation. Moreover, sequencing based molecular diagnostics are expensive with limited global availability highlighting the need for pre-sequencing strategies which identify populations enriched for individuals with high-risk clonal haematopoiesis. Methods: We used blood count parameters, age, and sex as input features to and develop a multi-class machine learning model that pre-classifies individuals based on their probability of having high-risk clonal haematopoiesis or developing future myeloid neoplasia. Stratified splitting was used to divide 461,576 eligible UK Biobank participants (recruited October 1, 2006 to March 13, 2010) into a training cohort for model derivation (n = 369,260) and a test cohort for internal validation (n = 92,316). Ground truth output class assignments were defined based on documented progression to incident myeloid neoplasia and presence of clonal haematopoiesis with high-risk features defined using molecular parameters of the clonal haematopoiesis risk score. Individuals were labelled positive if they had high-risk clonal haematopoiesis and progressed to myeloid neoplasia, negative if they lacked clonal haematopoiesis with high-risk features, and equivocal if they had higher risk features but had no documented incident myeloid neoplasia event. We then compared model predictions against ground truth labels for validation in the UKB test cohort as well as in independent clinical and population cohorts from Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Hematologic Malignancy Data Repository (HMDR; n = 2233; March 26, 2010, to June 5, 2024) and the All of US database (n = 14,674; May 31, 2017 to October 1, 2023), respectively. Findings: The resulting pre-sequencing risk model (PRISM) categorises all cases of high-risk clonal haematopoiesis as positive and pre-classifies 40% (2158 of 5383) of low-risk clonal haematopoiesis and 55% (47,894 of 86,429) of clonal haematopoiesis-negative cases as negative. Validation of PRISM revealed an area under the curve of 0.89 (95% CI 0.85-0.93) in the UK Biobank test cohort, 0.74 (0.61-0.84) in HMDR, and 0.87 (0.77-0.96) in All of US. Negative predictive values for negative class assignments were 0.993 (95% CI 0.992-0.993) in the UKB test cohort, 0.968 (0.943-0.981) in HMDR, and 0.998 (0.997-0.999) in All of US. Interpretation: PRISM positive class assignment defines a population most enriched for high-risk clonal haematopoiesis, while negative class predictions, mark individuals without high-risk clonal haematopoiesis. PRISM therefore provides a framework for reproducibly assigning blood count-based risk thresholds to prioritise clonal haematopoiesis screening in populations at risk for myeloid neoplasia. Funding: Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation, Edward P Evans Foundation for MDS, and the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute.

Indexed as

Blood countsClonal haematopoiesisHigh-risk clonal haematopoiesisMyeloid neoplasiaPre-sequencing risk modelPRISM

Identifiers

PMID42871440
PMCPMC13659614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.