ReviewClinical kidney journal2026
Kidney transplantation in multiple myeloma: patient selection, timing, and post-transplant challenges in the modern therapeutic era.
Review in Clinical kidney journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Kidney involvement is a common and clinically significant complication of multiple myeloma (MM), with a subset of patients progressing to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Historically, kidney transplantation was considered contraindicated in MM due to poor prognosis and high relapse rates. However, the introduction of novel anti-myeloma therapies has markedly improved hematologic responses and patient survival, leading to reconsideration of transplantation in this population. This review summarizes current evidence on patient selection, optimal timing, and post-transplant management of kidney transplantation in MM. Candidate selection should be guided by disease biology, depth of hematologic response, and remission durability. Transplantation is preferentially considered in patients achieving at least very good partial response, ideally with minimal residual disease negativity, while timing should be individualized according to cytogenetic risk, remission duration, and overall disease stability. Post-transplant management requires balancing immunosuppression with the competing risks of relapse, infection, and graft rejection. The optimal role of maintenance therapy remains uncertain, particularly given the potential interaction between anti-myeloma agents and allograft immunity. Available evidence, derived mainly from retrospective studies and small cohorts, suggests that patient and graft outcomes in carefully selected MM patients may approach those observed in other causes of ESKD. Although important uncertainties remain, kidney transplantation should be considered a viable treatment option within a multidisciplinary framework. Future studies are needed to refine eligibility criteria, optimize timing, and define long-term management strategies in this evolving population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.