ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026
A pilot study of invasive vagus nerve stimulation in Chinese patients with Alzheimer's disease: preliminary results on safety, cognition, and biomarkers.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder with no curative therapies, and vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has emerged as a promising neuromodulatory approach. This prospective, open-label pilot study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and preliminary cognitive, psychological, inflammatory, and AD biomarker effects of invasive VNS (iVNS) in Chinese AD patients. Methods: Five AD patients (mean age: 62.4 ± 4.0 years) underwent iVNS implantation, with assessments at baseline, 3, and 6 months postoperatively (one patient did not complete the 6-month follow-up). Cognitive function (MMSE, CDR, VFT, BNT), psychological/behavioral symptoms (CMAI, HAMA, HAMD), sleep/daily-living status (ESS, ADL), serum inflammatory factors, and AD biomarkers were measured. Results: Among cognitive outcomes, MMSE increased by 1 point at both follow-ups and VFT rose by 5.2 and 4.25 points at 3 and 6 months, respectively, although none of these changes reached statistical significance; global CDR remained unchanged. HAMA and HAMD scores decreased, and ESS scores declined by 25-27%, without reaching significance. Serum pro-inflammatory Eotaxin and CCL5 were significantly reduced ( Discussion: These preliminary findings suggest that iVNS is feasible and associated with early signals of cognitive, psychological, inflammatory, and biomarker changes in AD patients, which warrant confirmation in larger, randomized, sham-controlled trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.