ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2026
A review of advances in research on mechanisms inhibiting kidney stone formation from a network pharmacology perspective.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nephrolithiasis is a prevalent, highly recurrent urological disorder affecting 1%-15% of the global population, with 5-year recurrence rates reaching up to 50%. While surgical interventions achieve acute stone clearance, they do not resolve underlying metabolic derangements, crystal-induced tubular injury, or chronic inflammatory cascades. Natural products from global ethnomedicinal systems (including Traditional Chinese Medicine, Indian Ayurveda, Persian Unani medicine, European phytotherapy, and African ethnopharmacology) demonstrate potent multi-target anti-urolithic properties. However, decoding their intricate polypharmacology remains a major challenge. Network pharmacology, combining multi-omics profiling, computational target prediction, and network topology, has emerged as a promising paradigm to decipher these multi-component mechanisms. Unlike previous descriptive reviews that largely focused on narrow botanical catalogs or local traditions, this review establishes a critical, globally inclusive, and methodologically rigorous synthesis of network pharmacology-driven nephrolithiasis research from 2022 to 2026. We detail the fundamental pathophysiology across major stone types (calcium oxalate, calcium phosphate, uric acid, struvite, cystine) and the comprehensive cellular cascade encompassing crystal nucleation, Randall's plaque/plug formation, CD44-mediated adhesion, mitochondrial reactive oxygen species burst, endoplasmic reticulum stress, NLRP3 inflammasome activation, macrophage M1/M2 polarization, immunometabolism, extracellular vesicle communication, and programmed cell death (apoptosis, necroptosis, pyroptosis, ferroptosis, and PANoptosis). We critically synthesize evidence across diverse chemical classes (flavonoids, polyphenols, pentacyclic triterpenes, alkaloids, anthraquinones, tannins, polysaccharides, and marine bioactive metabolites), bridging computational predictions with established mechanistic milestones. Furthermore, we provide a deep critical appraisal of core methodological bottlenecks-target prediction bias, publication bias of over-studied hub genes, arbitrary pharmacokinetic cutoffs, circular virtual docking, and lack of renal bioavailability validation. Finally, we formulate a forward-looking translational roadmap integrating single-cell transcriptomics, humanized 3D organoid co-cultures, spatial multi-omics, reverse validation in longitudinal clinical registries, and machine learning feature selection, providing rigorous guidance for precision anti-urolithic drug discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.