ReviewInternational journal of dentistry2026
Contemporary Classification and Diagnostic Pathways for Common Gingival and Alveolar Ridge Lesions.
Review in International journal of dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oral lesions can be observed in different locations in the oral cavity, including periodontal supporting structures, gingiva, and alveolar ridge. Ranging from benign to potentially malignant lesions, these lesions can be described from various perspectives, including duration, size, origin, number, and clinical characteristics. Early diagnosis of these lesions can highly affect treatment procedures and outcomes, while preserving tooth-supporting tissues. This review aimed to introduce a decision tree for gingival and alveolar ridge lesions. According to the search strategy, a thorough electronic search was conducted in Web of Science, MEDLINE/PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, and Scopus to identify English-language studies published from January 2000 to June 2026. All clinical studies, including case reports and series, clinical trials and cohorts, and reviews, were considered eligible for inclusion. Initial search led to 6472 findings. Following screening and full-text assessment, 129 studies were finally included. According to clinical manifestations, four main groups of gingival and alveolar ridge lesions, named ulcers and erosions, exophytic lesions, white lesions, and pigmented lesions, were introduced. Based on the clinical characteristics of lesions in each group, certain entities were identified for each category. This review presented a clinically based decision tree to enhance the diagnostic accuracy of gingival and alveolar ridge lesions. Applying this decision tree in clinical practice can help with precise diagnosis and appropriate treatment selection, thereby further improving therapeutic outcomes and preserving the integrity of periodontal structures around teeth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.