Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42871361›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026

Facilitators and barriers to implementing AI-assisted diagnostic systems in primary healthcare services in low-resource settings: a mixed-methods study protocol.

Junhan Mu, Can Li, Ting Kang, Chengcheng Dong, Cong Chen, Bijie Ou, Huijuan Liang, Nan Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Junhan Mu *Department of Health Management, School of Health Management, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China.
Can Li *Department of Health Management, School of Health Management, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China.
Ting KangDepartment of Health Management, School of Health Management, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China.
Chengcheng DongDepartment of Health Management, School of Health Management, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China.
Cong ChenDepartment of Health Management, School of Health Management, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China.
Bijie OuDepartment of Health Management, School of Health Management, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China.
Huijuan LiangDepartment of Health Management, School of Health Management, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China.
Nan ZhangDepartment of Health Management, School of Health Management, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Although AI-assisted diagnostic systems are increasingly deployed in primary care globally, evidence from multiple countries indicates that deployment does not necessarily ensure clinical uptake. Resource-constrained and dispersed regions face implementation challenges, yet the mechanisms remain unclear. This mixed-methods protocol employs the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to systematically identify barriers and facilitators to AI implementation in primary care in such settings. Methods and analysis: This study adopts a sequential mixed-methods design. Phase I involves semi-structured in-depth interviews with multi-level stakeholders (defined by the 7P principle: Patients, Providers, Purchasers, Payers, Public, Policymakers, and Product suppliers), including primary care clinicians, facility managers, external administrators, and vendor staff. Purposive and maximum-variation sampling will cover diverse geographic areas and usage levels (high, low, and non-use). The interview guide will be developed based on the CFIR 2.0 domains. Interviews will be audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, thematically analysed, and mapped to CFIR 2.0 constructs. Phase I will recruit professional stakeholders and patients until information saturation is reached. Phase II comprises a cross-sectional survey of primary care patients targeting a minimum of 482 valid responses, to identify and quantify patient-level acceptance of AI-assisted diagnosis and its influencing factors, informed by patients' perspectives identified in Phase I. Phase III integrates findings from the first two phases and applies the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) and Implementation Mapping to formulate context-sensitive optimisation strategies. Ethics and dissemination: This study has been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Inner Mongolia Medical University (approval number: YKD202602099). All participants will provide written informed consent prior to data collection. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal publications, national and international conference presentations, and policy briefs submitted to local health authorities. Beyond the pastoral regions of China, this protocol aims to generate an evidence base and a replicable methodological template (integrating CFIR 2.0, COM-B, and Implementation Mapping) that may inform the scaled implementation of AI in comparable resource-constrained and geographically dispersed health systems. The transferability of the findings to settings such as those in Central Asia, sub-Saharan Africa, and Small Island Developing States will be explicitly assessed as a research question rather than assumed.

Indexed as

AI-assisted diagnostic systemsimplementation sciencelow-resource settingsmixed-methods studyprimary healthcaretechnology acceptance

Identifiers

PMID42871361
PMCPMC13658501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.