ReviewFrontiers in psychology2026
Beyond physical isolation: behavioral correlates and potential neurobiological mechanisms of functional social isolation.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Functional Social Isolation (FSI) describes a proposed form of social disconnection in the digital era, wherein individuals are physically co-present yet psychologically detached during pervasive digital immersion. This review examines how everyday digital immersion may contribute to persistent social disengagement, outlines its behavioral correlates and potential neurobiological pathways, and discusses its implications for public health and behavioral psychology. By synthesizing emerging literature on co-present digital immersion, social buffering, and neuroendocrine regulation, we identify five behavioral correlates relevant to FSI: attentional fragmentation, habitual or problematic online engagement, emotional volatility, avoidance of offline social interaction, and reduced practice of offline social skills. We also consider evidence concerning oxytocin, dopamine, norepinephrine, endocannabinoids, serotonin, and cortisol, alongside models of internet-related behaviors. These systems may represent candidate pathways linking digital immersion, attentional capture, affective regulation, and reduced engagement with available social partners. However, current neurobiological evidence is largely indirect and is not specific to FSI; similar patterns may arise from traditional social isolation, chronic stress, sleep disturbance, anxiety, or depression. We therefore present a hypothetical multi-system framework intended to generate testable predictions rather than establish an FSI-specific neurochemical state. FSI may be modifiable through interventions that reduce digital interruptions during face-to-face interaction and support meaningful synchronous engagement. Future research should validate its measurement, test causal pathways, and evaluate interventions across populations and social contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.