ArticleHealth science reports2026
Skin-Related Adverse Events in Patients Treated With Apalutamide Versus Enzalutamide for Prostate Cancer: A Japanese Real-World Database Study (A Retrospective Cohort Study).
Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Apalutamide (APA) and enzalutamide (ENZ) are androgen receptor pathway inhibitors widely used for prostate cancer. Skin rash is a characteristic adverse event of APA, but how often it occurs in real-world practice, the factors related to it, and possible differences by disease stage are not well understood. Methods: Using a Japanese nationwide claims database (Medical Data Vision), we identified patients with prostate cancer treated with APA (240 mg/day) or ENZ (160 mg/day) between April 2008 and August 2021. A skin-related adverse event was defined as a case with both a skin-related diagnosis and treatment for the skin event during therapy. Patients were classified as mCSPC or CRPC. We compared the rate and timing of skin rash between the two drugs and between disease stages, and examined associated clinical factors. Results: A total of 5524 patients were included (1264 APA and 4260 ENZ). The rate of skin rash was higher in the APA group than in the ENZ group (25.3% vs. 9.95%; Conclusion: Skin-related adverse events requiring treatment were more common with APA than with ENZ, but they did not differ by disease stage for either drug and were not predicted by body size. Careful skin monitoring and early intervention are important for all patients from the start of APA or ENZ treatment, regardless of disease stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.