ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2026
Comparative evaluation of metabolomic, microbial, and integrated features for distinguishing a rat model of heatstroke death from cervical-dislocation controls and estimating postmortem interval across organs.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Postmortem diagnosis of heatstroke death and postmortem interval (PMI) estimation remain challenging in forensic practice. This study aimed to evaluate the value of untargeted metabolomics, postmortem microbial profiling, and integrated metabolite-genus features for distinguishing a rat model of heatstroke death from cervical-dislocation controls and estimating PMI across multiple organs. Methods: A controlled rat model of heatstroke death (HS) and a cervical-dislocation control group (C) were established. Brain, cerebellum, liver, kidney, and skeletal muscle samples were collected at multiple PMIs and analyzed by untargeted metabolomics and 16S rRNA sequencing. Organ-specific machine learning models were constructed using metabolomic, microbial, and integrated features. For HS/C classification, PMI-matched model-development and external-validation subsets were analyzed using random forest with repeated five-fold cross-validation, whereas PMI regression models were constructed within the HS group using XGBoost. Model performance was evaluated by cross-validation and independent external validation, and feature contribution by random forest importance and SHAP analysis. Results: Multi-organ metabolomic profiles differed between HS and C and varied with PMI, whereas postmortem microbial profiles mainly reflected organ-dependent and PMI-associated community succession. For classification, aggregated OOF AUCs ranged from 0.971 to 1.000 for metabolomics, 0.837-0.918 for microbial profiling, and 0.986-1.000 for integrated models. Integration provided limited and inconsistent numerical gains over metabolomics alone, and feature-contribution analysis indicated that the discriminative signal was dominated by metabolites. For PMI regression, liver, kidney, and skeletal muscle showed stable external validation performance across their longer available PMI ranges, whereas brain and cerebellum were evaluated over shorter sampling windows. Integrated regression models achieved external validation Conclusion: Postmortem metabolomic and microbial profiles provided complementary but unequal predictive information in this controlled heatstroke model. Metabolomics was the principal information source for distinguishing HS from cervical-dislocation controls and estimating PMI, whereas microbial profiling mainly reflected PMI-associated succession. Under the present experimental setup, adding 16S-derived genus profiles provided limited additional value for classification and should be regarded mainly as a comparative or auxiliary component rather than a necessary routine layer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.