ArticleHealth affairs scholar2026
"Am I a candidate for magic mushrooms?" A mystery shopper study of Oregon psilocybin service centers.
Article in Health affairs scholar, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Oregon is the first US state to permit supervised psilocybin services through a nonmedical, wellness-based model. We examined what prospective clients with psychiatric histories encounter when contacting service centers, including how staff communicate about safety, eligibility, and cost. Methods: We conducted a mystery shopper study of 26 licensed service centers in Oregon (7/2025-9/2025), 4 of which closed before calls began, leaving 22 in the sample. We reviewed websites and conducted 2 waves of scripted phone calls portraying adults with depression. Website and call data were combined at the center level, counting an item as disclosed if it appeared online or during a call. Themes from call field notes were contextualized through structured debriefing interviews with service center staff. Results: Callers reached 15/22 centers, none of which permitted unsupervised consumption or immediate dosing without psychiatric assessment. Staff asked detailed questions about psychiatric comorbidities, addressing information gaps from websites, and none recommended discontinuing antidepressants. The median cost was $1900. Debriefing interviews described financial strain for service centers, with viability constrained by licensing fees and potential misalignment with cannabis-derived business models. Conclusion: Oregon's regulated model appears clinically cautious, while facing high costs for clients, facilitators, and service centers that limit scalability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.