Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42871204›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2027

Effects of rectal retractor use on dosimetric parameters, treatment-related adverse events, and clinical outcomes of cervical cancer brachytherapy: A retrospective tertiary-centre study.

Ayşe Hazırbulan, Huriye Şenay Kızıltan, Kimia Çepni, Merve Aldıkaçtıoğlu Talmaç, Halime Şule Selman, Ayben Yentek Balkanay, Elif Tekbaş, İlkbal Temel Yüksel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2027. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ayşe HazırbulanDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Huriye Şenay KızıltanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Kimia ÇepniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Merve Aldıkaçtıoğlu TalmaçDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Halime Şule SelmanPrivate Practice, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Ayben Yentek BalkanayDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Elif TekbaşDepartment of Medical Physics, Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
İlkbal Temel YükselDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Purpose: We assessed whether rectal retractor use was associated with dose parameters, organ volumes, treatment-related adverse events, and oncological outcomes in patients who underwent cervical cancer brachytherapy. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 148 patients treated with intracavitary brachytherapy between June 2020 and June 2025. Patients treated with and without a rectal retractor were compared regarding dosimetric, volumetric, adverse event, and survival outcomes. Adverse events were graded via RTOG criteria. Cumulative dose parameters were calculated using EQD2. ROC analysis and multivariable logistic regression were performed to evaluate factors associated with grade ≥ 2 adverse events. Results: Rectal retractor use occurred in 58 patients (39.2%). Baseline demographic characteristics and tumour size were comparable between groups, although rectal retractor use differed according to applicator type. Rectal retractor use was associated with lower rectal D2cc (no retractor vs. retractor: 65.70 Gy vs. 60.79 Gy, Conclusions: Rectal retractor use was associated with rectal dose sparing and lower odds of grade ≥ 2 vaginal adverse events without compromising target coverage. However, this finding should be interpreted cautiously because rectal retractor placement was not randomised and was influenced by applicator compatibility.

Indexed as

BrachytherapyOrgans at RiskRadiation InjuriesRadiotherapy DosageRectal RetractorTreatment OutcomeUterine Cervical Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID42871204
PMCPMC13658121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.