ReviewEuropean heart journal. Digital health2026
From wrist to heart: clinical validation and real-world translation of wearable and portable AI-enhanced electrocardiography.
Review in European heart journal. Digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wearable and portable electrocardiogram (ECG) devices are shifting cardiovascular monitoring beyond clinician-directed testing, driven by consumer-led self-monitoring, remote care, and preventive cardiology. Artificial intelligence (AI) may enhance the value of these devices by supporting automated interpretation, but clinical translation remains uneven. This narrative review synthesises current evidence on AI-enhanced ECG (AI-ECG) analysis in wearable and portable systems, with emphasis on the gap between technical performance and real-world implementation. Although many advances have been developed using conventional 12-lead ECG datasets, deployment in wearable and portable devices introduces additional challenges related to device-specific signal acquisition, preprocessing, domain shift, and user-led recording. Evidence is most mature for atrial fibrillation detection, while applications across conduction disease, other arrhythmias, structural phenotypes, and prognostic assessment remain earlier in development and are supported by fewer prospective, device-specific evaluations. Across the field, retrospective and dataset-based studies predominate, with limited evidence that improved detection translates into better patient outcomes or health-system efficiency. Future research should evaluate performance using the intended device, population, and clinical pathway, and determine whether AI-ECG changes management without increasing unnecessary investigation or workload. Establishing clinical value, rather than improving classification accuracy alone, will determine the role of wearable and portable AI-ECG in routine cardiovascular care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.