Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42871152›Full record

ReviewEuropean heart journal. Digital health2026

From wrist to heart: clinical validation and real-world translation of wearable and portable AI-enhanced electrocardiography.

Ahmed El-Medany, Aidan René Birdi, Aron Abraham, Tanush Pandey, Arunashis Sau, Sadia Khan, Fu Siong Ng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European heart journal. Digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ahmed El-MedanyNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4419-6693
Aidan René BirdiNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4098-9288
Aron AbrahamNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2096-3105
Tanush PandeyNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK.
Arunashis SauNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0204-7078
Sadia KhanNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0154-1776
Fu Siong NgNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8681-4368

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wearable and portable electrocardiogram (ECG) devices are shifting cardiovascular monitoring beyond clinician-directed testing, driven by consumer-led self-monitoring, remote care, and preventive cardiology. Artificial intelligence (AI) may enhance the value of these devices by supporting automated interpretation, but clinical translation remains uneven. This narrative review synthesises current evidence on AI-enhanced ECG (AI-ECG) analysis in wearable and portable systems, with emphasis on the gap between technical performance and real-world implementation. Although many advances have been developed using conventional 12-lead ECG datasets, deployment in wearable and portable devices introduces additional challenges related to device-specific signal acquisition, preprocessing, domain shift, and user-led recording. Evidence is most mature for atrial fibrillation detection, while applications across conduction disease, other arrhythmias, structural phenotypes, and prognostic assessment remain earlier in development and are supported by fewer prospective, device-specific evaluations. Across the field, retrospective and dataset-based studies predominate, with limited evidence that improved detection translates into better patient outcomes or health-system efficiency. Future research should evaluate performance using the intended device, population, and clinical pathway, and determine whether AI-ECG changes management without increasing unnecessary investigation or workload. Establishing clinical value, rather than improving classification accuracy alone, will determine the role of wearable and portable AI-ECG in routine cardiovascular care.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceClinical validationElectrocardiographyPortable devicesWearable devices

Identifiers

PMID42871152
PMCPMC13658271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.