ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026
A pilot study of rifle and head kinematics during 0.50 caliber rifle firing.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study analysed rifle and head kinematics during firing, using automated motion tracking to quantify maximum rifle displacement, head displacement, and head acceleration. Methods: Six professional snipers participated in repeated firing trials under controlled conditions. Additional trials were performed for selected participants to show recoil conditions without a muzzle brake. Results: Rifle displacement ranged from 36.30 to 67.65 mm and head displacement from 25.86 to 44.55 mm with the muzzle break, whereas without the muzzle brake values increased substantially to 76.36-102.97 mm and 76.47-82.47 mm, respectively. Peak head acceleration showed a less consistent pattern, ranging from 3.71 to 8.62 g with the muzzle brake and 5.10-8.71 g without it. Interindividual variability was observed across all measures, suggesting an influence of participant-specific biomechanical and anthropometric characteristics on recoil transmission. Discussion: The findings from this pilot study indicate that the use of a muzzlebrake may reduce the translational recoil motion of both the rifle and theshooter, whereas peak head acceleration appears to be less affected. However, as the condition without a muzzle break was evaluated in only two participants with a limited number of trials, these observations should be considered preliminary and descriptive rather than conclusive. The results also suggest that individual biomechanical factors may influence recoil response, highlighting the need for larger, balanced studies to better understand the effects of muzzle brakes and their potential implications for ergonomics and shooting performance optimisation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.