Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42871110›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

It changes your mind: doing gender by proxy and gender fluidity in the context of dementia.

Jordana L Clayton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jordana L ClaytonDepartment of Sociology and Criminology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People with dementia progressively lose the ability to act and make decisions independently, requiring a prolonged period of supported decision making and possibly complete decision making by proxy in the final stages of the disease. Sometimes, the decision-making process is complicated by the fact that people with dementia have different personalities, preferences, desires, and values compared to earlier in their lives, creating a conflict between earlier values and preferences and currently expressed ones. Most examinations of this process examine caregivers' proxy decisions around medical care, finances, and legal matters. However, caregivers engage in supported and proxy decision making processes in multiple areas of life, such as activities, dress, grooming, overall lifestyle; these areas of life are profoundly gendered for most people. This paper will extend the discussion of supported and proxy decision using West and Zimmerman's (1987) concept of doing gender and Judith Butler's (1990) gender performativity theory to theoretically examine how caregivers do gender by proxy for people with dementia and the possible impacts of having changing values, preferences, and desires around gender for people with dementia. First, I will review sociological theories of doing gender and gender performativity, followed by a review of current bioethical concepts of proxy decision making and the conflict between changing values and preferences prior to and during dementia. Then I will combine these theoretical traditions to conceptually define doing gender by proxy and gender-related supported decision making both in community and institutional settings.

Indexed as

CaregiversDecision MakingDementiaProxyFemaleHumansMaleagingbioethicscognitiondementiagendersexsurrogate decision making

Identifiers

PMID42871110
PMCPMC13658508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.