Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42871106›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2026

Changes in birth certificate-reported prevalence of congenital anomalies at live birth during the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide study of 26 million United States live births.

Qinchang Chen, Dongpo Liang, Shushui Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qinchang ChenDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Dongpo LiangDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Shushui WangDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although the majority of studies have indicated that maternal severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination are not associated with neonatal birth defects, it is relevant to examine whether the disease burden changed during the COVID-19 pandemic, as other influencing factors may have also changed. We aimed to compare the birth certificate-reported prevalence of congenital anomalies at live birth before and during the pandemic. Methods: Using public birth data, all live births from 2016 to 2022 in the United States of America (USA) were retrospectively included. The birth certificate-reported prevalence at live birth of selected congenital anomalies identified from the birth certificate, including anencephaly, meningomyelocele/spina bifida, cyanotic congenital heart disease (CCHD), congenital diaphragmatic hernia, omphalocele, gastroschisis, limb reduction defect, cleft lip, cleft palate, Down syndrome, chromosomal disorder, and hypospadias, was estimated and compared by calendar year of birth using logistic regression. Results: A total of 26,345,765 live-born infants from 2016 to 2022 were included. The mean gestational age of the infants was 38.4 weeks (SD = 2.1 weeks), 48.9% were female babies, and 96.7% were singleton. The overall reported prevalence of congenital anomalies was highest in 2018 (3.51‰, 95%CI = 3.45‰-3.57‰) and has since shown a decreasing trend [3.38‰ (95%CI = 3.32‰-3.44‰) in 2019 and 3.35‰ (95%CI = 3.29‰-3.41‰) in 2022]. Using 2019 as a reference, it did not differ in 2020 and 2021 [odds ratio (OR) = 1.01 (0.98-1.03) and OR = 1.00 (0.98-1.03), respectively, after adjusting for maternal age, ethnicity/race, and socioeconomic status] and was slightly lower in 2022 [OR = 0.97 (0.95-0.99)]. For the majority of the congenital anomalies, the reported prevalence during the pandemic (2020-2022) remained unchanged or showed a decreasing trend (i.e., gastroschisis and Down syndrome) compared with that in 2019. The reported prevalence of CCHD was higher in 2021 and 2022 than in 2019. However, the increase had begun before the pandemic, and after correction for multiple comparisons, only the 2021 contrast remained significant. Segmented regression confirmed a significant pre-pandemic upward trend in CCHD with a level change dated to infants born in March 2020. When exposure was re-indexed by estimated year of conception, neither pandemic conception cohort differed from the 2019 conception cohort [2020: OR = 1.03 (0.97-1.09); 2021: OR = 1.02 (0.97-1.08)]. The direction of these results was consistent when stratified by gestational age (≥37 or <37 weeks), with wider intervals in the preterm stratum. Conclusions: The birth certificate-reported prevalence of congenital anomalies at live birth did not increase during the COVID-19 pandemic in the USA and decreased for several specific anomalies. The higher reported prevalence of CCHD continues a trend that began before the pandemic and is null once exposure is aligned with organogenesis.

Indexed as

Birth CertificatesCongenital AbnormalitiesCOVID-19Live BirthFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornOmphalocelePregnancyPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2United Statesbirth certificatescongenital abnormalitiescongenital heart defectsCOVID-19prevalence

Identifiers

PMID42871106
PMCPMC13658458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.