ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
The impact of AI chatbot service quality on consumer purchase intention: the cognitive and affective mediating mechanisms.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The increasing prevalence of artificial intelligence chatbots in e-commerce raises questions about how the service quality dimensions of AI chatbots may influence consumer purchase intentions. Drawing on Expectation-Confirmation Theory, the Information Systems Success Model, and the Technology Acceptance Model, this study proposes a conceptual framework to examine these relationships. Methods: Survey data were collected from 493 Chinese consumers with prior experience using AI chatbots. The study examined perceived personalization, social presence, information quality, and human-AI service continuity as possible antecedents of purchase intention. Perceived usefulness and satisfaction were treated as mediating variables. Partial least squares structural equation modeling was used for the analysis with 5,000 bootstrapped resamples. Results: Perceived personalization, social presence, information quality, and human-AI service continuity were associated with perceived usefulness. Additionally, perceived personalization, information quality, and human-AI service continuity were positively associated with satisfaction. Conversely, social presence did not show a significant direct effect on satisfaction. Both perceived usefulness and satisfaction are linked to purchase intention, with satisfaction having a stronger direct connection. The mediation analysis revealed that perceived usefulness and satisfaction mediate the relationship between AI chatbot service quality and purchase intention. The only exception was the indirect effect of social presence through satisfaction, which was not statistically significant. Discussion: This study seeks to contribute to understanding how the service quality of AI chatbots influences consumers' purchase intentions through perceived usefulness and satisfaction. The results indicate that information quality is the most significant among the service quality dimensions in AI-mediated interactions. The lack of a significant direct impact of social presence on satisfaction suggests that, in utilitarian-oriented e-commerce environments, consumers are more likely to prioritize functional service features over social-emotional factors when assessing AI chatbot services. These findings may inform e-commerce practitioners seeking to improve AI-driven customer service by emphasizing information accuracy and completeness, enhancing personalization, and fostering seamless human-AI service continuity to drive purchase conversions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.