Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42871037›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Dual-pathway processing of AI-generated Chinese ink painting: evidence from eye-tracking, EEG, and artistic expertise.

Qiang Qin, Jing Chai, Wanni Zhong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qiang QinAcademy of Arts & Design, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Jing ChaiCollege of Fine Arts, Capital Normal University, Beijing, China.
Wanni ZhongCollege of Fine Arts, Hongik University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AI-driven generative art is changing the scope of artistic creation, but the principles behind its aesthetics and the perception of its outcomes remain relatively unexplored, especially concerning culturally specific art forms. The present study investigates how viewers cognitively, affectively, and evaluatively process AI-generated Chinese ink paintings, and whether artistic expertise moderates these responses. We introduce the concept of expressive expansion as a viewer-perceived psychological effect - the tendency for AI-generated ink works to elicit higher ratings of expressiveness and dynamic tension than traditional counterparts - and examine its neural and behavioral correlates using a multimodal paradigm. Stimuli generated using a pre-trained Stable Diffusion architecture were assessed according to three aesthetic metrics along with traditional and digital non-AI artworks by 120 respondents equally split into professional artists and non-artists. Multidimensional measurement based on eye-tracking, semantic differential rating, and EEG showed that, under blind viewing conditions, AI-generated stimuli yielded significantly greater scan-path entropy and beta band suppression than traditional and digital non-AI works, suggesting that they engaged broader attentional exploration and increased attentional engagement as indexed by implicit behavioral and neural measures. Professional and non-professional evaluators agreed on expressiveness evaluation scores but differed considerably in their cultural authenticity perception, suggesting a dissociation between aesthetic appeal and cultural validity. These findings are consistent with a dual-pathway interpretive framework in which perceptual-affective and cultural-evaluative responses can dissociate as a function of artistic expertise - an account advanced as consistent with the observed dissociation rather than as a mechanism established by the present data - and contribute to the emerging empirical literature on audience responses to AI-generated art in culturally specific domains. All conclusions are restricted to the selected stimulus sets under the present experimental conditions. The source code, LoRA model weights, and experimental datasets will be made publicly available at: https://github.com/15100376058/ink-painting-ai-expressive-expansion (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20540420).

Indexed as

algorithmic artistic conceptionChinese ink paintingexpressive expansionneuroaestheticstransmedia convergence

Identifiers

PMID42871037
PMCPMC13658077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.