ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Absolute and lung volume-normalized deep learning-derived pulmonary vascular measures in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: distinct clinical associations and the role of lung volume in prognosis.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) has an unpredictable course and poor outcome, and lung function-based risk stratification remains incomplete. Whether absolute and lung volume-normalized deep learning-derived CT pulmonary vascular measurements show distinct associations with disease severity and mortality in patients with IPF remains unclear. Methods: In this dual-center retrospective study, 118 adults with newly diagnosed IPF, including 57 from the Italian cohort and 61 from the French cohort, underwent baseline chest CT analyzed with a deep learning-based quantitative pipeline combining lung parenchyma (whole lung volume, WLV; fibrosis extent) and pulmonary vascular metrics (total blood volume, TBV; and derived BV Results: Compared with controls, IPF patients had lower WLV and higher absolute TBV. Relative TBV (normalized to WLV) correlated strongly with fibrosis, while absolute TBV showed weaker associations. Relative vascular metrics inversely related to baseline lung function, whereas absolute TBV showed no significant association. Baseline TBV, BV Conclusion: Normalized and absolute pulmonary vascular metrics capture different aspects of IPF, with normalized measures associated with fibrosis burden and functional impairment, while absolute vascular volumes were associated with mortality, although this association was substantially attenuated after accounting for WLV. Absolute vascular volume may therefore partly reflect preserved lung volume rather than an independent prognostic effect. Prospective validation is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.