ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026
The ablation margin as a regenerative and immunosuppressive niche in hepatocellular carcinoma: multicellular remodeling and organoid-on-a-chip modeling.
Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thermal ablation is an important local treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), yet post-ablation local tumor progression remains a major obstacle to durable disease control. Traditionally, recurrence has been attributed mainly to incomplete thermal coverage, inadequate ablative margins, or heat-sink effects. However, increasing evidence suggests that the sublethal thermal injury (STI) zone at the ablation margin is not merely a passive physical boundary, but a biologically active injury-repair microenvironment. Within this region, gradients of thermal dose, hypoxia, damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), extracellular matrix mechanics, and immune infiltration may interact to shape residual tumor cell behavior. Post-ablation remodeling is likely driven by coordinated crosstalk among myeloid cells, hepatic stellate cells/cancer-associated fibroblast-like stromal cells (HSCs/CAFs), endothelial cells, neutrophils, adaptive immune cells, and residual tumor cells. These interactions may promote epithelial-mesenchymal transition, stem-like plasticity, immune evasion, angiogenic repair, and local tumor progression. Current two-dimensional (2D) cultures lack three-dimensional architecture and multicellular spatial interactions, whereas animal models are limited by variable thermal dose control, restricted real-time imaging, and interspecies differences. Emerging HCC organoid-on-a-chip platforms may help address these gaps by integrating patient-derived organoids (PDOs), tunable extracellular matrix hydrogels, microfluidic thermal and hypoxic gradients, and defined multicellular co-culture modules. Importantly, immune checkpoint testing requires immune-competent extensions incorporating autologous T cells, and antigen-presentation studies require dendritic cells. This review discusses the ablation margin as a multicellular recurrence niche and evaluates organoid-on-a-chip systems as hypothesis-generating tools for mechanism-guided and safety-conscious adjuvant strategy development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.