Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42871014›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

From leadership to innovation: the psychological pathways of intrinsic motivation and creative process engagement.

Jianqiang Zhang, Chenglei Song

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jianqiang ZhangSchool of Accounting, Anhui Wenda University of Information Engineering, Hefei, China.
Chenglei SongSchool of Management, Xinyang Agriculture and Forestry University, Xinyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Although responsible leadership (RL) has attracted increasing attention from the academic community, the correlation mechanism between it and employee innovative behavior (EIB) has not been fully clarified. Based on the data of high-tech enterprises in China, this study explores how intrinsic motivation (IM) and creative process engagement (CPE) explain the relationship between responsible leadership and innovative behavior. Method: This study uses SPSS 27.0 and AMOS software for statistical analysis. The data is collected on the Credamo platform. After routine data screening and cleaning, 344 valid replies are used for follow-up analysis. Result: The results showed that RL was positively related to EIB, with IM and CPE independently mediating this relationship. Besides, the sequential indirect effect of RL on EIB through IM and CPE was also significant. Discussion: The findings indicated that IM and CPE serve as two interconnected mechanisms linking RL with EIB. Drawing on self-determination theory and social information processing theory, this study further illustrates how employees interpret responsible leadership-related information, develop IM, and remain engaged in creative activities.

Indexed as

creative process engagementemployee innovative behaviorintrinsic motivationresponsible leadershipself-determination theorysocial information processing theory

Identifiers

PMID42871014
PMCPMC13658070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.