ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Is empathy-driven teaching effective in cultural product design? An empirical study on students' empathy and design creativity.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cultural product design (CPD) education concerns not only students' extraction and translation of traditional cultural elements, but also their understanding of the cultural contexts behind cultural artefacts and the experiences of potential users. Empathy is considered to help designers understand needs, emotions, and contexts from the perspectives of others; however, its role in CPD education remains insufficiently examined through empirical research. This study introduced an empathy-driven instructional approach to examine its associations with students' empathy and design creativity. Methods: The participants were 79 undergraduate students from two intact classes in a CPD course. The two classes were assigned at the class level to either the empathy-driven instructional approach or the traditional instructional approach. The empathy-driven group received systematic guidance based on the empathy-driven instructional approach, whereas the traditional group received the traditional instructional approach. Both groups completed design tasks based on designated cultural artefacts. Results: The results showed that students in the empathy-driven group demonstrated higher levels of empathy than those in the traditional group. The analyses also identified significant indirect associations through empathy between the instructional approach and the novelty and quality of design outcomes, a pattern consistent with partial mediation. Discussion: These findings suggest that the empathy-driven instructional approach in CPD education can help students develop a more integrated understanding of the relationships among artefact contexts, user experiences, and contemporary product experiences, and may support the generation of design outcomes with greater novelty and quality. This study provides preliminary empirical evidence for incorporating empathy training into CPD education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.