ArticleAIMS neuroscience2026
Phase-specific alpha tACS over the dlPFC does not enhance cognitive reappraisal or autonomic responses: A sham-controlled crossover study.
Article in AIMS neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cognitive reappraisal (CR) relies on prefrontal top-down control over limbic systems, with the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) playing a central regulatory role. Alpha-frequency transcranial alternating current stimulation (α-tACS) can modulate cortical oscillations; yet, its causal contribution to emotion regulation (ER) remains unclear. Objective: In this study, we investigated whether in-phase or anti-phase alpha-tACS influenced subjective and physiological responses during cognitive reappraisal of negative emotional stimuli. Methods: Forty-two healthy young adults completed three counterbalanced sessions (in-phase, anti-phase, sham) in a single-blind, sham-controlled crossover design. During α-tACS or sham, participants applied three CR strategies (positive, fictional, distancing) while viewing negative and neutral film clips. Valence, arousal, heart rate (HR), skin conductance (SC), respiratory rate (RR), and pre/post-session affect (PANAS) were recorded. Results: The Emotional Movie Database (EMDB) emotional stimuli elicited the expected subjective and autonomic responses, confirming that the task engaged emotional-reactivity processes. Participants also showed a typical habituation pattern in physiological measures across blocks. However, neither in-phase nor anti-phase alpha-tACS was associated with measurable changes in subjective emotional ratings or autonomic responses relative to sham under the experimental conditions. Conclusion: This study provides the first evaluation of phase-specific alpha-tACS during cognitive reappraisal using film-based stimuli. Under the experimental conditions, no measurable effects of in-phase or anti-phase stimulation on subjective or autonomic measures of ER were observed. Future studies incorporating individualized stimulation frequencies, multi-session protocols, closed-loop stimulation, and concurrent electrophysiological recordings may help clarify the conditions under which phase-specific tACS influences ER.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.