Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42870977›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

A process-oriented interpretation of perfectionism: error, uncertainty, and the principles of organization.

Adel Bartos, Kristof Schwartz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Adel BartosDoctoral School of Education, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Kristof SchwartzDepartment of Psychology and Health Management, Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, Széchenyi István University, Győr, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contemporary dimensional models have substantially advanced the psychological understanding of perfectionism. However, growing theoretical and empirical evidence suggests that understanding the phenomenon may also require consideration of additional process-oriented perspectives. Rather than proposing a new definition of perfectionism, the present Perspective introduces a complementary process-oriented interpretative framework that focuses on the principles of organization underlying the phenomenon. Particular attention is directed toward individuals' relations to error, uncertainty, and performance-related self-evaluation, as well as to the experiential organization associated with these processes. Within this framework, perfectionism is interpreted as a psychological configuration in which flawlessness functions as a normative reference point, organizing self-evaluation, anticipatory regulation, and the interpretation of action. The paper further argues that characteristics commonly associated with perfectionistic strivings may, in some cases, reflect striving for excellence rather than perfectionism itself, suggesting that these forms of functioning may be organized according to different psychological principles. A phenomenological analysis illustrates how anticipation of mistakes may influence attentional focus, temporal experience, self-monitoring, and the lived experience of action. The proposed perspective is not intended to replace existing dimensional models but to complement them by offering an additional process-oriented level of interpretation. At the theoretical level, this framework contributes to a more differentiated understanding of perfectionism, while at the empirical level it highlights new directions for investigating error anticipation, regulatory flexibility, conditional self-evaluation, and other dynamic psychological processes that may not be fully captured by traditional trait-based measures.

Indexed as

conditional self-wortherror sensitivityperfectionismphenomenologyuncertainty

Identifiers

PMID42870977
PMCPMC13657996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.