ReviewAnnals of cardiothoracic surgery2026
Transaxillary valve surgery: innovation through simplicity in minimally invasive cardiac surgery.
Review in Annals of cardiothoracic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) is widely recognized as an essential component of contemporary cardiac surgical practice, offering reduced surgical trauma, faster recovery, and improved patient satisfaction while maintaining excellent clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, despite decades of technological progress and growing clinical evidence, its adoption remains limited. One of the principal barriers to wider dissemination is the procedural complexity associated with many minimally invasive platforms. Reduced operative exposure, indirect visualization, and dependence on dedicated technology frequently result in demanding workflows, prolonged learning curves, and limited reproducibility. The right transaxillary mini-thoracotomy direct vision approach was developed according to a different philosophy. Rather than relying on additional technology to compensate for the constraints of minimally invasive access, it simplifies the operative platform by preserving the natural interaction between the surgeon and the operative field. By combining favorable surgical geometry, direct visualization, and a standardized operative platform, the transaxillary approach facilitates procedural efficiency, reproducibility, and potential applicability across a broad spectrum of minimally invasive valve surgery while relying primarily on conventional surgical instrumentation. More broadly, the transaxillary concept suggests that the future dissemination of MICS may depend not only on technological innovation, but also on the ability to simplify procedural execution, facilitate reproducibility, and lower the barriers to adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.