ArticleAnnals of cardiothoracic surgery2026
Transaxillary access for ascending aortic and root surgery: a single-center comparison with full and partial sternotomy.
Article in Annals of cardiothoracic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Minimally invasive approaches for ascending aortic and root surgery remain controversial regarding operative complexity and safety. The transaxillary (TAX) approach avoids sternotomy entirely but has not been compared with both full sternotomy (FS) and partial upper sternotomy [minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MIC)]. This study evaluates perioperative outcomes across these three access strategies. Methods: Between January 2022 and December 2025, 194 consecutive patients undergoing elective isolated ascending aortic or root surgery were retrospectively analyzed. Surgical access was FS (n=52), MIC (n=106), or TAX (n=36). TAX suitability was assessed by team consensus on electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated computed tomography (CT). Primary endpoints were in-hospital mortality, major complications [Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) composite], and hospital length of stay. TAX was compared with MIC after 1:2 propensity score matching. FS served as descriptive reference. Results: FS patients had higher EuroSCORE II (median 2.7 Conclusions: TAX ascending aortic and root surgery was feasible in carefully selected patients, with no in-hospital mortality, no stroke, and no wound complications. In a propensity-matched comparison with partial upper sternotomy, early outcomes did not differ significantly despite longer bypass time. TAX extends the sternal-sparing concept to the aortic root and ascending aorta and warrants prospective evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.