ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
From public innovation procurement requirements to AI-enabled socio-technical architecture: a longitudinal case study in industrialized housing.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is used in digital systems that combine data, computational methods, decision processes, and organizational arrangements. This paper examines how the requirements and institutional conditions of a public innovation procurement process are reflected in the development and specification of an AI-enabled socio-technical architecture for industrialized public housing delivery. The case concerns an AI-enabled system intended to support the design, assessment, and procurement preparation of industrialized housing within a public-sector delivery process. Using a longitudinal qualitative pre-deployment case-study design, we analyze a documentary corpus covering institutional procurement records, the initial technical proposal, its formal ex-ante assessment, and subsequent collaborative development. The architecture documented in the case comprises eight interconnected functional modules and three cross-cutting enablers: security, governance, and interoperability. It combines rule-based regulatory and contextual checking, generative and parametric design configuration, surrogate-model-supported performance estimation, cost and financial assessment, multi-objective optimization, multicriteria scenario comparison, and procurement-document generation. Across the corpus, we identify traceable correspondences between institutional requirements and functional, computational, governance, and interoperability arrangements, while keeping requirements, specifications, formal ex-ante assessment, subsequent development, and evidence requiring operational validation distinct. The contribution is an account of how AI-related and other computational capabilities are integrated with data, human decision points, governance arrangements, and procurement outputs within an evolving socio-technical architecture. We do not evaluate a completed system or establish operational effectiveness, scalability, or broader public outcomes. It provides a pre-deployment account of how procurement and institutional requirements correspond to the architecture of an AI-enabled decision-support system for industrialized housing delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.