ArticleFrontiers in dental medicine2026
Periodontal Medicine 2.0: a framework for evidence-calibrated, integrated and patient-centred care.
Article in Frontiers in dental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Periodontal medicine has generated substantial evidence that periodontal and systemic health are biologically, behaviourally, and socially interconnected. Yet a persistent translational gap remains: knowledge of oral-systemic relationships has advanced faster than the systems required to convert this knowledge into coordinated, patient-centred care. Dentistry and medicine continue to operate within fragmented professional structures, limiting opportunities for prevention, early risk identification, and longitudinal disease management. We propose Periodontal Medicine 2.0 (PM2.0), an author derived conceptual hypothesis that reimagines periodontal medicine beyond the study of oral-systemic associations toward evidence-calibrated translation and integrated care. Its proposed contribution lies in the clinically significant interactions amongst the four principal domains centred on the periodontal patient: integrated oral-systemic screening, interprofessional collaborative care, precision periodontal medicine, and population health and policy integration. Digital health and AI, patient engagement, health literacy, equity, ethics and implementation science are positioned as cross-cutting enablers. PM2.0 proposes that these domains should interact according to evidence maturity, clinical relevance and implementation readiness, rather than through uniform integration. The framework distinguishes association from causality, screening from diagnosis, diagnostic performance from clinical utility, and technological capability from demonstrated patient benefit. It proposes a risk based, longitudinal pathway linking periodontal assessment with selective risk identification, coordinated care, individualized management and evaluation. The central hypothesis is that appropriately connected and evidence-calibrated functions may generate greater translational value than fragmented approaches. This proposition is testable through clinical, patient reported, implementation, economic, safety and equity outcomes. PM2.0 is therefore presented not as an established historical stage, clinical guideline or validated model of care, but as a literature-informed hypothesis for the future organization of periodontal medicine- from association to evidence based action, and from action to demonstrable impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.