ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Navigating the systemic labyrinth: the dual-track breakthrough of student-athletes under China's "Integration of Sports and Education".
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Although dual career (DC) development has received growing international attention, the psychosocial experiences of high-level student-athletes (HLSAs) within China's evolving Integration of Sports and Education (ISE) context remain underexplored. Methods: This study adopted an interpretivist qualitative design and used Reflexive Thematic Analysis to examine retrospective developmental accounts from 19 Chinese HLSAs admitted to university through the high-level sports team pathway. Results: Athletic achievement expanded access to higher education but did not automatically secure stable competence, legitimacy, or belonging across academic and athletic settings. Effort often remained within HLSAs' control even when its returns became uncertain because of injury, bodily limits, competitive conditions, and fluctuating performance, requiring athletes to recalibrate causal expectations and perceptions of what could still be changed. Institutional support, recognition, and opportunities also varied with athletic standing, making the quality of integration psychologically consequential beyond the formal coexistence of sport and education. Discussion: These findings conceptualize DC as a process of conditional inclusion. Chinese HLSAs navigate a systemically structured but psychologically experienced labyrinth, in which breakthrough occurs when athletic achievement is transformed from an entry credential and performance identity into a broader basis for competence, belonging, self-redefinition, and future possibility. Effective ISE therefore requires developmental conditions that allow sporting achievement to open educational opportunities without defining the limits of student-athletes' subsequent academic, personal, and career development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.