ArticleTranslational cancer research2026
Incidence, characteristics, and exploratory analysis of factors associated with pelvic osteitis/osteoradionecrosis after radiotherapy for cervical cancer: a single-center retrospective cohort study with an unmatched case-control analysis.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pelvic radiotherapy is the standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer and has substantially improved patient survival. As survival has increased, late radiation-related complications have become increasingly important. Radiation osteitis (RO) and osteoradionecrosis (ORN) are uncommon but potentially disabling forms of radiation-induced pelvic bone injury. However, most previous studies have focused on pelvic insufficiency fractures (PIFs) rather than pelvic RO/ORN. Consequently, the incidence, clinical characteristics, imaging features, and risk factors of pelvic RO/ORN remain poorly defined, particularly in patients treated with contemporary intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). This study aimed to investigate the incidence, clinical and imaging characteristics, and potential risk factors of pelvic RO/ORN in cervical cancer patients receiving pelvic radiotherapy. Methods: A retrospective cohort study with an unmatched case-control analysis was conducted among 308 cervical cancer patients treated with pelvic radiotherapy between January 2015 and December 2021. After follow-up and imaging review, 28 patients diagnosed with pelvic RO/ORN were identified. Fifty-six controls were selected by simple random sampling without replacement from the remaining cohort members in whom RO/ORN was not identified during available follow-up. Clinical characteristics, tumor features, and treatment-related variables were compared between groups. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were exploratory. Results: Pelvic RO/ORN was identified in 28 of 308 patients, corresponding to an incidence of 9.1%. The median time to diagnosis was 22.5 months [interquartile range (IQR), 15.5-33.0 months] after radiotherapy. The sacrum/sacroiliac region and ilium were the most frequently involved sites. Typical imaging findings included mixed osteolytic and sclerotic lesions, irregular cortical disruption, and inflammatory changes in adjacent soft tissues. Seventeen patients (60.7%) had pelvic or hip pain or movement-related symptoms, whereas 11 (39.3%) were identified on surveillance imaging without apparent symptoms. No statistically significant between-group differences were observed for the clinical and treatment variables examined (all P>0.05). Exploratory multivariable logistic regression did not identify clear independent associations in this dataset. Conclusions: Pelvic RO/ORN is a clinically relevant late effect of pelvic radiotherapy for cervical cancer. In this dataset, no clear predictors were identified among the clinical and treatment variables examined; this negative finding should be interpreted cautiously because the number of events was limited and patient-specific pelvic bone dosimetry and bone-health measures were unavailable. Future risk assessment should move beyond conventional clinical parameters by integrating dosimetric, imaging, and biological markers to clarify risk factors and the value of earlier detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.